In the discussion thread for SCP-2030, Vezaz has reacted extremely negatively towards criticism about his article (which is a repost with minor changes of his own article that was in the negatives). Like, hatefully so:
Aelanna: I'm not sure I see what's changed. The tone is still inconsistent enough to be considered a 'format screw', it's still a canon-specific SCP object, and it still doesn't explain why the tone is as such. It would probably be way more palatable if there was a note explaining the documentation is archival or something, but as it is, it's still suffering from all the problems I downvoted the first version for.
Vezaz: Oh buzz off.
Dexanote: She's a member of the Criticism team giving her opinion on the article. it's legitimate criticism, she's entitled to give it if she wants to. It's not good form to simply tell someone to buzz off. You're simply expected to follow certain templates and guidelines while writing an SCP article.
Vezaz: You too, dexa, and stuff that team nonsense while you're at it.
I Staff Posted:
Vezaz, you need to cut out the hateful responses to criticism of your work. Comments like "buzz off" and "stuff it" are rude, condescending, hateful, and completely inappropriate. If you can respond to your critics without being so rude, condescending, and hateful, then by all means do so. But you can't just tell your critics to buzz off. Consider this an official warning.