New site member Djayrainstorm (account age 2 days, site membership 1 day) recently coldposted an article that's currently in deletion. Their response has been excessively vehement, culminating in: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-7844433/scp-3487#post-4018295 (post title "Oh great my crap is being deleted.")
Welp. This was a flop. But I'm confused about why. I've seen some REALLY bad SCPs that get upvoted, and mine, which is also bad, is getting only downvoted. I am confused. Are people unaware of the awful SCPs I've seen that honestly need deleting more then my SCP does? Come on. The people on this wiki make no sense. Also, don't waste your time getting offended by this post and then reporting it, it really isn't worth it.
-Thanks, A confused Beginner Author
Excerpt from the article:
SCP-3487 currently resides in Site 19. Access to the SCP is for 2+ level personnel. Any person looking to use SCP-3487 for any reason must receive access from the O5 Council. SCP-3487 is to be kept in a bulletproof, locked container, in Researcher ██████ desk. SCP-3487 must be kept just as any ordinary gun is to be kept. There must be no bullets inside SCP-3487 unless in use. When testing, the subject must only be a trusted researcher, and never a Class-D as the Class-D could use it to harm anyone present during the test.
A community member responded with the following:
To which the author responded with: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-7844433/scp-3487#post-4018361
Oh alright, got it. I'll write something that isn't SHAT.
Of note, they had several other questionable posts previously, including:
- response to a staff voting on a deletion post: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-7844433/scp-3487#post-4018164 "If you're replying because you want to rewrite this you can."
- http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-7844433/scp-3487#post-4017261 "I would appreciate if people would post feedback instead of downvoting or upvoting. You can still downvote or upvote but I would really like feedback as well. Thanks to those of you who already do this."
- when told that the mainsite is for summary judgment and feedback should be sought before a mainlist post: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-7844433/scp-3487#post-4017278 "Alright but I still like feedback if something is horrifyingly messed up."
Admittedly, given their writing and behavior, it doesn't seem like they're of the age apparently noted in their wikidot profile (15). Keep an eye on.