User Dave Mike has recently given out some pretty useless critique:
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-783549/a-woman-with-her-unborn-child-as-her-brain#post-1981749
You say SCP-XXXX To many times. Try referring it as the specimen orgasim… Please tell me i spelled that right. and so on just make sure it is a clinical term not monster or some other ████. So apart from that you did a really good job at making a disturbing SCP if you want to know if you're using SCP-XXXX too many times in your article is if you scroll down the page very fast. If you can count more than 5 SCP-XXXX's there is probably still alot. That or XXXX really stands out from all the words.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-783468/new-scp-needs-critiquing#post-1980881
The scps title needs to the SCP's actual name.
Seeing as this guy hasn’t quite grasped basic capitalization (e.g. http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-783493/leather-man ), I don’t really feel comfortable with them giving out any critique right now. I know there’s not much precedence for outright “don’t post critique ever”, but in this case, I think it might be necessary.