So, recently, people have been questioning the validity of our signature ban, and it got me thinking about why we actually do ban them. I realize they do annoy some people, but as long as they aren't something disruptive or inappropriate, I see no reason why we shouldn't allow people to have them. I mean, the Russians are able to handle allowing signatures just fine, and there are plenty of people who use WikiDot signatures as part of other sites, and it isn't fair to them to have a flat ban on signatures.
Not to say that they shouldn't be totally unmoderated though. If somebody has a ridiculously long/offensive/just plain stupid signature, we can ask them to change it. I also don't think we'd need to allow people to have pictures in their signature, for the same reason we don't allow them in the forums.
So, thoughts?
Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!