Also, he still needs to fix the lizard genome/gnome mixup.
…and here I thought he had a bunch of mini-SCP-682's running around, which might actually be funny.
Yeah, I'm assuming he's referencing Wikidot karma, which he doesn't appear to understand.
I assume. I don't have 5 bars of karma (like anyone cares) because I don't edit other people's articles very often.
OK, since ShazakG reads O5…
Dear ShazakG:
Let me clear up the one serious point in what is otherwise a page that made me laugh hard enough that I almost spilled my coffee. No one here is threatening you. People are keeping an eye on your site and noting what you may have copied from ours because plagiarism is bad and will get you into trouble. Do not get yourself involved in any sort of creative writing without knowing that. We have rules here against trolling and/or hacking, including doing it to other sites in the name of the SCP Foundation. No one, especially not Staff, is going to do that.
I wasn't threatening you; I was being dismissive. There is a big difference. If you like the SCP concept so much, why wouldn't you post your articles on our site? Right…they're not good enough to stay there. Rather than learn to improve them, you ran off and started your own place to post them. Fine. I'll get out of the way of the stampede of new members you're getting.
Members:
ShazakG since 3 May 2013, 18:20 (2 days ago)
Oh, wait. Never mind.
I critisized your wiki, and now instead of "making it better"…
1. I'm not sure how packing up your toys and going home counts as a critique.
2. How was I supposed to make it better? By letting your misspelled, poorly conceived articles stay around, even though no one liked them? I couldn't do that even if I wanted to, since we work by a voting system.