Al/DrMarch
Banned for being a general slapnuts and impersonating staff.
Military Consultant, SCP Wiki
Al/DrMarch
Forum
» SCP Chat / Chat Users
» Al/DrMarch
Summary:
Banned
(account deleted)Logs:
[18:55:37] <TroyL> Roget. Try changing you name. I need to see if it only works on join.
[18:55:44] <Bananaman> ok
[18:55:49] * Bananaman is now known as Roget
[18:55:56] * AI is now known as Bananaman
[18:55:57] * TroyL has kicked Roget from #site19 (You have been kicked by TroyBot [Reason: You are now set to autokick by TroyBot])
[18:56:05] * Roget (suruas.eht|esohw#suruas.eht|esohw) has joined
[18:56:05] * ChanServ gives channel operator status to Roget
[18:56:06] * Bananaman is now known as AI
[18:56:09] <AI> Wow, that worked.
[18:56:09] <Soulless> RODL
[18:56:12] <TroyL> It's off.
[18:56:13] <Soulless> ROFL
[18:56:16] * Roget has kicked AI from #site19 (op impersonation)
[18:56:26] * AI (ea.ten.limahsla.D67CC10D-CRInys|hcraMrD#ea.ten.limahsla.D67CC10D-CRInys|hcraMrD) has joined
[18:56:31] <ShangXiao> AI, don't do that again.
[18:56:37] <Sw0rd> http://25.media.tumblr.com/e7743535ebd7da71730529471d21a5da/tumblr_mka4uuF5dn1rgpg5xo1_500.jpg
[18:56:42] <AI> God, i've been kicked so much i have /join #site19 in my Pastebin.
[18:56:43] <Sw0rd> Wooo
[18:56:45] <ShangXiao> That is staff impersonation, and that is bannable.
[18:56:56] <Echo> Hey AI
[18:57:02] <Vorcha> ShangXiao
[18:57:02] <AI> Shang, i was testing if i'd get autokicked.
[18:57:08] <AI> Wasn't planning on keeping it on.
[18:57:09] * Echo sets ban on *!*@synIRC-D01CC76D.alshamil.net.ae
[18:57:09] * Echo has kicked AI from #site19 (Echo)
[18:57:13] <Vorcha> what if a staff member impersonated themselves
[18:57:20] <Echo> Fucking retard.
[15:57] Roget Echo why did we ban that guy
[15:58] TroyL OP Impersonation.
[15:58] thedeadlymoose We're not going to leave him banned, I hope.
[15:58] Echo http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-639132/al-drmarch
[15:58] thedeadlymoose Based on what Sorts already established for his new regime, we're not banning people for fucking around when ops are also fucking around :p
[15:59] TroyL Roget: Stop.
[15:59] TroyL I'm bot testing.
[15:59] TroyL :|
[15:59] Roget fiiiine
[16:00] vezaz wait troybot is actually active ???
[16:00] vezaz I thought you were just dicking around!
[16:00] Echo Sorts can kiss my ass on that. It's in the chat guide; don't impersonate ops
[16:00] Echo Being a retard on top of it doesn't help at all
[16:00] Echo There's fucking around and then there's being a willful slapnuts
[16:02] TroyL Make sure you note it on O5.
Ultimately I'm not going to push the point, mostly because this user was being kind of an idiot all day. And plus I do not speak for Sorts [or any other operator, for that matter].
Two things.
One:
Sorts can kiss my ass on that. It's in the chat guide; don't impersonate ops
No, Echo. It's not.
Two:
I do not speak for Sorts [or any other operator, for that matter].
So speak for yourself Moose. If you think the ban was bad say so on the merits, not on what you think I might say. There were plenty of other ops on hand who didn't see a problem so don't use this as a chance to let me know Echo wants me to smooch him on the bottom. That's kind of low.
Fair enough. Then let me clarify, as I should have done in the first place.
I didn't think the ban was bad. I felt iffy about it, and ultimately decided not to contest it. If I had come to a more useful conclusion, I'd have said so (and probably added a wall of text justifying it), as I usually do.
It seemed to me that it was ambiguous on the merits, but unambiguous in that it contradicted the way you had asked us to operate. Which concerns me from the perspective of "inconsistency is fuckin' shitty when applied to punishments". But ultimately literally zero people have piped up to agree with me, so *shrugs*. Perhaps it's not as inconsistent as it looks, and he got re-banned under another nickname anyway. So it looks like ultimately it turned out perfectly fine.
A clarification of why I clarified that I didn't speak for you: I thought the argument I made in the log was a bad one because all I did was appeal to authority - your authority, which was especially silly given context.
so don't use this as a chance to let me know Echo wants me to smooch him on the bottom.
I can kind of see where you got that idea, but I think you've understood the dynamics wrong here.
If I wanted to let you know specifically that Echo wanted you to make out with his rear end, then I would have PMed you that specifically along with my concerns [if I had them].
Or asked Echo to PM you and say the same thing. I would bet my left testicle that he'd have been MORE than happy to relay exactly that to you, probably in even more colorful language. [He can certainly contradict me if I am incorrect here.]
It's not a secret that I disapprove of Echo's behavior on occasion, but this isn't an instance where I was trying to draw attention to it (not the ass-kissing part, anyway).
Man. This is why we should always think through our posts. Would have saved me all the time it took me to write this reply, which including a CLARIFICATION OF A CLARIFICATION :/ hopefully I do not need to write a clarification of a clarification of a clarification :(
Also, linking this: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-639614/powerbomb for the record of the second banning.
EDIT: And so I don't get confused by looking at this thread again, for the record, this user has been permanently banned for ban evasion.
Removed — but solely to clear space. Feel free to re-ban if they return and act like a dumbass.
Actually, scratch that, this guy evaded a lot and this was only a few months ago, so I'll keep it on for now
/forum/t-639132/al-drmarch#post-