Uncle Nicolini has recently started to give problematic, pretty vague feedback in the forums:
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-5741351/scp-triumf#post-3772446
This feels a lot like SCP-096 except in the sense that it's essentially a (nearly) unstoppable force gunning for its target but on the condition that it's got its MacGuffin handy.
The writing isn't clinical like an SCP report should be, it reads more like a shopping list.
It's a little rough around the edges but with some work could be a lot better.
Hope this was constructive. :)
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-5741743/my-first-scp:must-be-willing-to-travel#post-3772427
[…]
However, this SCP is a bit messy. I don't really understand what it does aside from not allow entry unless it is paid before disappearing and having a bizarre ringleader. Why did the SCP suddenly attack a Foundation site? Why was it considered Neutralized so quickly after the attack?I feel this needs a lot more description work and a stronger modus operandi. […]
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-5741784/revised-first-scp#post-3772398
That being said, my biggest concern is the labeling of Thaumiel. Just what makes this scip a Thaumiel class? What makes it so hard to contain? I understand it blows up whatever building it gets brought into, but if it's capable of doing that how was it brought into a facility and used to stop a containment breach?
[…]
I feel like this SCP has a good premise, but could use a lot of revision to make it make sense, as well as some format adjustments. […]
Keep an eye on. They seem to mean well, but they're falling into the newbie critiquer trap of "mention a few small details/questions, then just say "needs more"".