Supplement Deletion

Supplement Deletion

TroyL 18 Sep 2012 21:30

A lot of just turrible supplements have been getting left behind. I'm just going to do one, big deletion vote here, let everyone vote, then nuke and record on the main site. Not all of these are at -10, but since the original SCP has been deleted, I see no reason to keep them. The security breach page has been archived in the snippets from chat thread.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1184-interview
http://www.scp-wiki.net/incident-report-i1937-b
http://www.scp-wiki.net/incident-report-i1937-a
http://www.scp-wiki.net/interview-362
http://www.scp-wiki.net/experiment-log-118
http://www.scp-wiki.net/security-breach

Thanks.

---

"WELL FOUNDATION. YOU MADE IT SO EASY. SO VERY VERY EASY." - dimensionpotato

Re: Supplement Deletion

Communism will win 18 Sep 2012 21:32

I'll vote for deletion on all of them, but note that Security Breach needs to be kept somewhere, because it is good.

---

Art blog | Personal/political blog | I'm un-retired from the SCP community. Go check out Regicide, my Homestuck fanfic, too. | Death to America.

Re: Supplement Deletion

TroyL 18 Sep 2012 22:19

Security Breach was archived in the "Snippets from Chat."

---

"WELL FOUNDATION. YOU MADE IT SO EASY. SO VERY VERY EASY." - dimensionpotato

Re: Supplement Deletion

RhettSarlin 18 Sep 2012 21:32

Voting in favor of deletion. Really, to some extent I would think it silly to not automatically delete supplementary pages to an article, as they are obviously intended to be a part of it, no additional vote needed.

Re: Supplement Deletion

Drewbear 18 Sep 2012 21:33

I abstain on Interview 362, since I'm technically doing a very slow rewrite on it. But I have the original copy saved to my sandbox, so it's no loss to me if it's deleted in the interim.

Otherwise, I vote to delete all.

---

Giving bearhugs to the unsuspecting since 1872.

Re: Supplement Deletion

thedeadlymoose 18 Sep 2012 21:39

I vote to delete all.

On that note, there is absolutely no damn reason that we shouldn't delete orphaned pages if said orphaned pages were missed during initial deletion by mistake (as opposed to intentionally). Can we think about changing this policy?

The only one even close to worthwhile is Interview 362, and Drewbear already has that saved. Just make note of the original author, Drewbear (Noilen, for the record).

EDIT: ACTUALLY, I vote against deletion on "Security Breach", if only because I find the comment trail charming. Kill the rest, though.

Last edited on 18 Sep 2012 21:41 by thedeadlymoose Show more

Re: Supplement Deletion

Pig_catapult 19 Sep 2012 04:15

+1

---

Piffy is an SCP Foundation Moderator, Lv. 9001 Squishy Wizard, and Knight of the Red Pen.

Re: Supplement Deletion

eric_h 18 Sep 2012 22:25

I don't really see any reason to keep stray pages around that were part of deleted SCPs.

Tales using deleted SCPs are a different story (they should stand on their own ratings) but these pages really should have gone away with the SCP they belonged to.

---

SCP Wiki Senior Citizen Staff | Thank you for testing my new memetic Forum sig

Re: Supplement Deletion

Adam Smascher 18 Sep 2012 22:25

Kill it all.

Re: Supplement Deletion

TroyL 19 Sep 2012 08:06

I'm nuking all of these but security breach. Moose, save a copy of the discussion if you want it. I'll nuke it in a day or so.

---

"WELL FOUNDATION. YOU MADE IT SO EASY. SO VERY VERY EASY." - dimensionpotato