New site member JHarrison8008132, now JHarrison88132 (account age 2 days, site membership 1 day) has recently been posting some vague, unhelpful feedback:
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-4780758/first-scp#post-3676094
I think it’s pretty good and well-written. The only things I’d suggest is to add a little more detail - but of course remain vague and conspicous - and as usual, proofread to ensure the best vocabulary and grammar. 👌🏻
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-4789986/help-out#post-3676250
Okay, first of all: use the sandbox to prevent a huge chunk of text like this one ^^^.
Second of all the writing is good and I have nothing to say about it besides make sure, as always, to continue to improve and add to it.
Also make sure to use the formatting tools as described in How To Write SCPs.
They've also responded poorly to feedback, for example: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-4788901/new-scp#post-3676260
I like your trying to improve the accuracy but this is a website with sentient soap and teleporting monsters, I’m sure inaccurate DNA can exist and be accepted. Of course I’ll still take your advices into consideration.
Plus also a somewhat-spammy post from them here: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-4778238/a-really-good-joke-scp
Keep an eye on. Seems like standard newbie/potentially-underage behavior here.