Disregard.
The pastebin is gone. Here's another copy: http://clay.blorgblorgbl.org/fekket.html
Session Start: Sun Aug 01 21:55:38 2010
Session Ident: FekketCantenel
[21:55] Session Ident: FekketCantenel (synIRC, Waxx) (~ten.xoc.sk.vf.AC64AF91-CRInys|CtekkeF#ten.xoc.sk.vf.AC64AF91-CRInys|CtekkeF)
[21:55] <FekketCantenel> uh, you might want to see this
[21:55] <FekketCantenel> http://scp-eval.pastebin.com/K8tLufpY
[21:55] <FekketCantenel> from what I've read so far, this was before the stuff today
15[21:56] <Waxx> I have no idea
[21:56] <FekketCantenel> <Laito> I can start trolling if you like <Laito> The kind that makes them not stand being here
15[21:57] <Waxx> He's not going to troll you, trust me
[21:57] <FekketCantenel> no, I'm thinking this was before today
[21:57] <FekketCantenel> like they arranged all that shit in advance
[21:57] <FekketCantenel> oh, then again, there's stuff in the log that seems reactive to today
[21:57] <FekketCantenel> so it must be recent
15[21:57] <Waxx> I doub tit
[21:58] <FekketCantenel> holy shit, reading through this log, I'm really REALLY glad to not be in #site19
[22:04] <FekketCantenel> I'm trying to decide where to publicly post this log.
Session Close: Sun Aug 01 22:04:54 2010
Session Start: Sun Aug 01 22:05:40 2010
Session Ident: FekketCantenel
[22:05] Session Ident: FekketCantenel (synIRC, Waxx) (~ten.xoc.sk.vf.AC64AF91-CRInys|CtekkeF#ten.xoc.sk.vf.AC64AF91-CRInys|CtekkeF)
[22:05] <FekketCantenel> I mean, I've never been more disgusted with humanity than in this moment
Session Close: Sun Aug 01 22:29:15 2010
Session Start: Thu Oct 06 22:49:55 2011
Session Ident: FekketCantenel
[22:49] Session Ident: FekketCantenel (synIRC, Waxx) (~ten.xoc.sk.vf.687BAD9-CRInys|CtekkeF#ten.xoc.sk.vf.687BAD9-CRInys|CtekkeF)
[22:49] <FekketCantenel> you there?
15[22:50] <Waxx> Good evening fekket
[22:50] <FekketCantenel> I was wondering if I could quietly get that thread on the SCP admin forum deleted or set to hidden or something
[22:50] <FekketCantenel> did a vanity search this evening and it's like result #7
15[22:50] <Waxx> No
[22:50] <FekketCantenel> which I guess shows that you guys have good SEO
15[22:50] <Waxx> But
15[22:50] <Waxx> I don't know if anyone told you, you're unbanned
15[22:50] <Waxx> I own the chatroom now
15[22:50] <Waxx> Things have changed a bit
15[22:50] <Waxx> You're welcome back any time
[22:50] <FekketCantenel> I'm not too into SCP anymore though, haven't even read it in a long time
[22:50] <FekketCantenel> but thanks for the offer
15[22:51] <Waxx> Oh me either, I never look at the wiki
[22:51] <FekketCantenel> I'm just concerned about this thread that paints me as a bitch, showing up high in google results
15[22:51] <Waxx> I still feel you were wrongly banned at the time though and wanted to put it right
13[22:51] * FekketCantenel rubs chin
[22:51] <FekketCantenel> is it like, it's just not possible to delete threads on the forum?
[22:51] <FekketCantenel> like a software thing?
15[22:52] <Waxx> Of course it's possible
15[22:52] <Waxx> But it's wrong to do so
[22:52] <FekketCantenel> also I started to wonder what's the point of #site19 without being into SCP, and then I realized that we don't do many Let's Reads in #lets-read anymore
15[22:52] <Waxx> lol
[22:52] <FekketCantenel> could you expound on 'wrong to do so'
15[22:54] <Waxx> Those records are there for a reason
15[22:54] <Waxx> Why does it concern you so much
[22:54] <FekketCantenel> I'm going to be publishing some books soon, so I'm doing some reputation management
[22:54] <FekketCantenel> I wouldn't care if this was on like page 17 of the google results, but it's actually on the first page on a search for 'fekketcantenel'
[22:55] <FekketCantenel> and since it features almost exclusively people who didn't/don't like me, it sort of paints me in a really bad light
15[22:55] <Waxx> Nothing I can do about it, sorry
[22:56] <FekketCantenel> you said you wanted to put the whole thing right
15[22:56] <Waxx> Erasing records doesn't put it right, especially just to suit someone's vanity
[22:57] <FekketCantenel> there's vanity and there's not wanting whatever this is
[22:57] <FekketCantenel> if I'd gotten to participate, it'd be one thing
15[22:57] <Waxx> It isn't going to go away
15[22:58] <Waxx> I will not remove records for one person just because they don't like the fact that they are there
15[22:58] <Waxx> Sorry if that's an issue but I am not doing to do that
[22:58] <FekketCantenel> I'm trying to understand
[22:58] <FekketCantenel> you agree that I was wronged throughout and want to make it better
[22:58] <FekketCantenel> but then you don't want to make it better
15[22:58] <Waxx> I've already made it better by undoing the ban
[22:59] <FekketCantenel> I'm much more concerned about this
15[22:59] <Waxx> Clearly
15[22:59] <Waxx> But that is irrelevant
15[22:59] <Waxx> Honestly if you really think a forum thread is going to harm your reputation, you think too highly of yourself
15[23:00] <Waxx> God forbid you ever enter politics
[23:00] <FekketCantenel> put it this way
[23:00] <FekketCantenel> imagine you were googling around about an author you were thinking about reading
[23:00] <FekketCantenel> and you come upon that thread
[23:00] <FekketCantenel> with no prior knowledge of what they're like
15[23:00] <Waxx> I wouldn't give a shit
[23:00] <FekketCantenel> you're not most people
[23:01] <FekketCantenel> you might be an idealist, but I'm having to be a realist here
15[23:01] <Waxx> I'm more realist than you think
15[23:01] <Waxx> Because I don't give a shit about authors
15[23:01] <Waxx> I only care about the books they write
15[23:01] <Waxx> And that's the same for most people
15[23:01] <Waxx> Dan Abnett might beat his wife mercilessly but I don't give a fuck because he writes a damn good book
15[23:01] <Waxx> The same is true for you
15[23:01] <Waxx> If this really concerns you, you're worrying too much
15[23:01] <Waxx> You'll thank me later
15[23:02] <Waxx> This isn't a criminal record
15[23:03] <Waxx> It's you getting banned from an irc room
15[23:03] <Waxx> Really, now
[23:03] <FekketCantenel> what about the fact that it includes private logs
[23:03] <FekketCantenel> of course, the morality of leaking private conversations is all over the place
15[23:03] <Waxx> Who cares
15[23:03] <Waxx> Seriously
[23:03] <FekketCantenel> I care
15[23:03] <Waxx> You care too much then
[23:05] <FekketCantenel> I don't appreciate having my words, said in private, leaked online
[23:05] <FekketCantenel> can you at least understand that
15[23:05] <Waxx> If you keep bugging me about it I am going to post this log in there as well
[23:06] <FekketCantenel> and now you're threatening me?
[23:06] <FekketCantenel> have a nice evening
15[23:06] <Waxx> If you want to call that a threat, rofl
Session Time: Fri Oct 07 00:00:00 2011
Session Close: Fri Oct 07 01:07:36 2011
"WELL FOUNDATION. YOU MADE IT SO EASY. SO VERY VERY EASY." - dimensionpotato
So, this girl complained, and wikidot deleted it? Hmm.
Admin, SCP Wiki
That's not okay. I'm happy that we were able to retain a copy of that log, at least…
For the record, fekket was banned for being extremely unpleasant and starting arguments as often as possible, as well as repeatedly trolling other users. She enjoyed discussing what a great writer she was despite never having posted anything, as well as making personal attacks on others from the same pedestal.
Overall, she was a great example to me of what not to be.
All that said, she's apparently no longer banned, according to those logs.
Also, just because she's apparently trying to make her reputation vanish and I'm spiteful enough not to let that happen, fekket is also a well known translator on lolicon forums and has done personal translations of several hardcore lolicon and guro doujins. I didn't make that up, and a few minutes on google will confirm it. Unless she's gone over people's heads to make that disappear too.
I'm not sure how the second section is relevant there, Yoric. What difference does it make that she's translated some weird shit?
While I'll give you that in regards tot he guro, lolicon is a bit more serious than "some weird shit". I mean, it's good that she and her audience are indulging in fictional characters rather than abusing real children, but that doesn't make it not really fucking creepy in the bad way.
Piffy is an SCP Foundation Moderator, Lv. 9001 Squishy Wizard, and Knight of the Red Pen.
It's not relevant, hence the line. I just want it to pop up in fekketcantenel's potential reader's searches.
She PM'd me, so, for posterity:
<FekketCantenel> I agree that lolicon is freakish. I haven't translated anything in six years, and as far as I remember, never touched lolicon or guro, since I find them repugnant.
<FekketCantenel> it's no secret that some weirdos got me to translate porn as a kid, I even put it on my about page at http://homework.never-ends.net/about/
<FekketCantenel> sorry to message you out of the blue, I just wanted to reassure you that I'm not some pedophile, I was just a stupid kid who met the wrong people
Make of it what you will.
Piffy is an SCP Foundation Moderator, Lv. 9001 Squishy Wizard, and Knight of the Red Pen.
If we were supposedly violating the ToS, I for one would like to know exactly how they were allegedly violated. Did the Wikidot administrators happen to send a message to anyone (maybe Gears since he's Master Admin) explaining why they deleted the thread?
As an aside, I find it hilarious that fekket believes that anything said in chat counts as private conversation.
Bright's sent a message off inquiring about it.
I will be very interested in what they have to say.
Indeed. This could be very interesting.
Verily.
In case it's relevant, her side of things, as she sent to me:
[17:42] FekketCantenel since people are curious, yes, I checked out the Wikidot TOS and it has rules against bullying and posting private info
[17:42] FekketCantenel I emailed them, and a mod replied back that the thread violated their TOS and that he would delete it
[17:43] FekketCantenel I've notified him about this current thread and requested that he message the current admin or post publically about the TOS
Piffy is an SCP Foundation Moderator, Lv. 9001 Squishy Wizard, and Knight of the Red Pen.
Next thing you know, she'll be suing us for violating wiretapping laws for posting PM logs.
Well, she also thanked me for posting it, so… I'm leaning towards "no" on that one.
[17:49] FekketCantenel I feel sort of weird posting 'through' you, but I'm grateful you're allowing me to be heard
[17:50] Pig_catapult I'm just doing my job.
Piffy is an SCP Foundation Moderator, Lv. 9001 Squishy Wizard, and Knight of the Red Pen.
Hi fekket! It warms my dearest cockles that you think so much of us that you've been skulking in the margins of our IRC channels for, what, a year now? More than that? And following our administrative forum that you've not been invited to read at all so religiously, too.
It's very helpful of you to point out to us that wikidot does, in fact, have a ToS agreement that allows users to whitewash out their past infractions. In fact, I briefly considered using the same method to get rid of my own disciplinary threads, but after a moment's consideration decided to act like an adult about it instead. It wouldn't be very mature of me to make such an issue of an irc ban thread. Pretending I'm bullied would be morally wrong of me, as well as painfully narcissistic. Fortunately, I have responsible users like yourself acting as examples of when it's okay to lean on administrators for my own ends, and how to do it responsibly.
Just so you know, I fully support your decision to shift blame and hide facts rather than sully yourself by accepting responsibility for your past actions, both in this and the kiddie porn situations. Two thumbs, as far up as you like.
In the end, it's for the best. I'd hate any publishers to hear that fekketcantenel is a deeply unpleasant person. It would be awful for your career.
Is there actually a problem here? She used a valid policy on the site we're HOSTED on, and we've granted deletions (of articles, at least, but I don't see why it would be different for posts) to banned users in the past. We're not out to be moral guardians of anything, and, mostly, she's gone now.
One could argue that her use of that policy was not valid, but mostly I think it's just got a few of us righteously annoyed that a person who is not even a member of staff could go over our administrators heads in that fashion.
Had it been her posts, then yes, deleting them at her request would fall under our normal policy. However, they were our posts, and she's not even a welcome member of this wiki. I do not personally believe any justification for her to have any say in what is posted here exists.
Man, she's worse than what we thought she was back then.
For her record, there was no bullying or private info posted. So, she can suck it.
Admin, SCP Wiki
Hi,
The content has been reported and found as defamatory and harassing. I have seen that there is further forum discussion about Fekket Cantenel on your side. Please do not publish any information considered as defamatory, harassing, personal, including chat logs. I do not want any personal fights on Wikidot. You can always make your site private and available only for members so it won't be indexed by Google. Further reports may cause site deletion without any warning.
Best regards,—
Łukasz Tarka
Project Manager
moc.todikiw|akrat.zsakul#moc.todikiw|akrat.zsakul
Wikidot Inc.
ul. Łazienna 13/2
87-100 Toruń
POLAND
Phone: +48564754757
Fax: +48564754756
http://www.wikidot.com/company
I replied with a message explaining how, since it was true, it was not defamatory, and as it was something we had up for our records, and in no way directed at her, it was not harassment.
Admin, SCP Wiki
Since he elected to reply personally, I'm confidant that we'll be able to get this sorted out. I get the impression, though, that his suggestion to privatize this wiki was a "hint, hint" sort of tip.
Unless we're trimming the membership to less than 5, a private wiki is going to cost money.
Welp.
Guys, I figured out where the profits from merch can go.
As long as extra money doesn't ever get spent on "politically neutral" causes that are not, it sounds like a fine idea.
Sorts, calm thy shit, son. I only know a few charity causes by name, and picked some at random as examples.