Crosslinking Non-Disc record for information: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-1553394/non-disc-record-tuckerdkeith
User tuckerdkeith has a history of low-quality drafts in the forums and not responding well (if at all) to feedback, and has also given low-quality reviews in the forums.
They were recently cease-and-desist order in the forums for said low-quality reviews, and the same day were revoked for their apparent lack of understanding how the site works. Upon their return to the site, they posted the following: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1553614/first-scp-ever#post-2439492
Alright so I do want to make some advice and criticism if that is ok. So as the Vets. have said already, you really don´t need so much protection for/from a tank, and As they said before it is inert. That being said you put in:
[quoted from draft] SCP-2976 is free for anyone to explore, as it is impossible to harm the SCP.
I see what you are saying but again, it´s tank, an indestructible one. You don't want average jim to go around Site 19 in a tank with MTF on his tail. So yeah you need some restrictions. I also want to point out that ¨SCP-2976 is free for anyone to explore¨ your making it sound like it´s a corn maze. The Idea it´s ehhh not very salvageable… But I have faith in ya! Good luck sonny!
Note that this occurred after they'd been sent a PM about the forum C&D, and they replied to said PM. I Closed staffposted.
Moving for ban. At this point, is it week long?
Edit: Noting that the ban is meant to be considered a "short ban". Given that the 24-hour period following the revoke doesn't seem to have impacted the user's problematic behavior enough, I suggested weeklong in lieu of a 24-hour ban.