User Woodrow Hill (W: 2022-03-28; S: 2022-03-30) has posted three low-effort coldposts within the span of three hours, the same day they joined the wiki. fabledtiefling does not match any existing user name has staffposted the most recent one, and sent the user a PM asking them to stop posting without seeking feedback first.
Recommending keeping an eye out, and warning/revoke if this behaviour continues.
Updated this to a Disc record as the user has continued to coldpost, today submitting this page: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-6127 which is currently at -16. Excerpt:
SCP-6127 most often appears as a human skeleton but is able to change forms at will. SCP-6127 is immobile for most of the months of March and October. When SCP-6127 is immobile it releases a sound that resembles that of a human-like scream. this has been revealed to be identical to the human or human-like object closest to it. SCP-6127 was originally in use by the Chaos Insurgency and was extensively used for war. physical contact with SCP-6127's spinal cord causes it to enter a rage state where it will attempt to kill anything it sees.
As the page received downvotes and reviews, the user posted the following comments:
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-14712539/scp-6127#post-5316946
I want to know why SCp-6127 is rated so low, it was on a sandbox and well thought out…
if this is the work of trolls, stop it.please… don't delete it… at least try to rewrite it to your taste… i want to know why it's reception is so low……..
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-14712539/scp-6127#post-5316965
bruh. i had this proofread by an ENGLISH TEACHER!!!! about the critique, maybe make a line by line one and then help me edit it?
They do seem to have attempted to seek feedback in the forums:
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-14686033/greenlights (full draft in thread, no greenlights)
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-14696229/scp-skeleton-thing-greenlights (didn't use template, stated "I think I might do it anyway. If it gets a positive reception, my membership can stay, if not, then you can take it away. that's the most i'm willing to compromise.")
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-14709575/scp-xxxx-sapient-skeleton-retreived-by-chaos-insurgency (did not fill in template)
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-14709843/continuation-of-my-new-scp-idea-thread-since-i-can-t-access (second repeat thread)
I believe at this point we are at official warning?
Noting that the user once more coldposted low-quality work and responded poorly to downvotes:
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/halloween-con-2022/comments/show#post-5635070 (post title "Report")
@DrApricus just downvoted my work with no explanation, even though I asked hime to
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/halloween-con-2022/comments/show#post-5635103 (response to a staff post)
I worked for three days, and he disrespected my work. so did you. why don't YOU explain your reasoning. also, read my profile.
actually, i don't care anymore.
Edit: I hope you know who "the creature" is
OKAY!!! THAT IS ENOUGH. I bet no even read the tale, just downvoted for shits and giggles. READ THE TALE and THEN vote
please?
I emergency revoked as the user was continuing to spam (including posting on the Halloween contest discussion thread to ask people to read their entry) and also was flagging their downvoters as abusive. These abuse flags have since been cleared.
(It was brought to staff attention that the user's profile indicates that they did not meet the age requirement.)
A ban was issued and PM was sent. I received the following message in response:
Fuck you too, SCP wiki
Screenshots of the case are available to staff upon request.