This is a voting thread for this thread: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-14210135/tag-request-thread-rework-ii
Sections 1 and 2 of the proposal proposed did not receive any objections and pass as is. Neither of these sections needed a vote in the first place.
Section 3 had an objection to tale series tags. This point must be voted on specifically. The other changes to tag changes also need to be voted on as a whole, as they did not receive detailed objections.
Given the positive response to the revised Section 4 posted later in the thread, seen below, that section will be taken and voted on.
Section 4: Defining Authorial Autonomy
We have previously allowed authors to veto any tags that they had a major say in the creation of. However, this is unpopular and we currently believe that this runs counter to the ideas of the tag system as a whole. Going forward, we will end this practice as such. Authors will be allowed to object to a tag, and their objections will be considered, but will not be taken as absolute and totally block a tag from creation.
Please vote yes or no on the following question: Should tag minimums and recommendations be implemented as per the proposal?
Please rank your choices for the following possible Tale Series minimums:1
- Minimum 5x3, recommended 10x5.
- The 5x1, 7x2, 10x3 system — increasing article requirement as authors rise.
- Either 5x3 or 10x1 as acceptable minimums.
Please vote yes or no on the following question: Should we end the practice of allowing an authorial veto for tags?
= **Minimums and Recommendations:**
||~ Yes||~ No||
|| X || X ||
= **Tale Series:**
||~ 5x3, 10x5||~ 5x1/7x2/10x3||~ 5x3 or 10x1||
|| # || # || # ||
= **End Authorial Veto:**
||~ Yes||~ No||
|| X || X ||
This vote will last for one week and is open to Operational Staff or Higher.
can I get some nice "no signatures on my forum"
sigma-9 css machine broke
understandable have a nice day
