Disciplinary - totallynotmyname69

Summary:

Rule 0.

Disciplinary - totallynotmyname69

TheMightyMcB 13 Jun 2021 01:39

Site member totallynotmyname69 (162 days on site) recently left a couple of low-quality critique comments on posted works. Aside from a few other similarly low-quality comments made about six months ago, the following make up nearly their entire comment history:

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-2240395/scp-2166#post-5002649

welp. this got my -1. just nothing at all interesting here.

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-1293787/scp-2851#post-4990999

this was just painful to read. and i mean that literally, the terrible color scheme of the page literally burns the eyes.

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-5669937/scp-3502#post-5001557

boring, pointless, and goes nowhere. -1

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-14008892/scp-5433#post-4997258

im sorry but why didnt you spend any time explaining WHY its an SCP? or is it JUST because its a low level AI without any actual special properties who cant actually DO anything? if the latter, why is this even a scip? this dosent need to be contained based on whats shown, nobody would even know it was an AI.

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-11714160/scp-4098#post-5002653

cant tell if this is extremely poorly written, or if the SCP turns you into some 3rd worlder whos using google translate. either way, gets my -1

---

I staffposted an official warning onto that last one for the blatant mean-spiritedness of the comment as well as the blatant bigotry. I will also send the user a PM informing them of the warning. Recommending a ban on the next violation of the criticism policy or Rule 0.

Re: Disciplinary - totallynotmyname69

TheMightyMcB 13 Jun 2021 01:43

PM sent.

+ show block

Hello totallynotmyname69,

You have been issued an official warning by the SCP Wiki Disciplinary Team for the behavior documented in your disc thread: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-14118791/disciplinary-totallynotmyname69

As stated in the Site Rules:
> Rule Zero: Don't be a dick. Every other rule follows from this.

Further infractions will result in a ban.

TheMightyMcB
SCP Wiki Disciplinary Team

Re: Disciplinary - totallynotmyname69

TheMightyMcB 19 Jun 2021 03:39

Got a reply:

+ show block

im a bit confused, was this re-sent or something? i swear ive received this message before with that same link, but its not showing up in my inbox. for clarifications sake on some of the flagged posts however, which i assume are the ones violating the criticism policy such as "welp. this got my -1. just nothing at all interesting here.", am i correct in the belief that the issue there is that i simply said that i dont find it interesting and did not state why and/or how to improve upon it? not really sure how stating that the color scheme of a page is painful to view is invalid criticism though. the rest i get. though i would appreciate you dont slander me by calling me "mean spirited" when im reffering to an article being incomprehensible due to extremely poor choices that make it akin to someone using google translator, and not insulting a person.

I have not responded yet.

My response:

+ show block

totallynotmyname69,

I only sent one PM, so if there was a repeat sent, it's likely due to a Wikidot error. That aside, the comment you made about "some 3rd worlder whos using google translate" is both needlessly mean and pretty racist, and it was deserving of an official warning all on its own. The other comments that violated the criticism policy are just providing further context. Your concerns have been noted on the thread, but it will remain otherwise unchanged.

Regards,
TheMightyMcB
SCP Wiki Disciplinary Team

Last edited on 19 Jun 2021 18:28 by TheMightyMcB Show more

Re: Disciplinary - totallynotmyname69

TheMightyMcB 25 Jun 2021 19:59

Got another reply from them:

+ show block

so fuck me then? not gonna even bother giving a barebones answer to clarify what i asked? and stop with that "racist mean spirited" nonsense, i was speaking about an article and the FACT that it reads as incoherent gibberish of a very specific type. pointing out facts is neither of those things. i think its funny that i cant point out how the article clearly dosent meet any standards whatsoever, but that incoherent mess of semi random nonsense is allowed to be here. good to see that the rules about writing articles are complete nonsense that dont matter, i think ill go throw a random story generator at google translator a few times and post it too.