Disciplinary - ShatteredAnvil

Summary:

Really doesn't understand guidelines

Disciplinary - ShatteredAnvil

Zyn 18 Jan 2021 05:08

New site member ShatteredAnvil (account age 52 days, site membership 45 days) has demonstrated that they don't understand how to follow the forum guidelines:

• Posted a concept thread that originally did not follow the template: http://www.scpwiki.com/forum/t-13960086/scp-idea
• Posted another thread for the same concept, later edited to put the full draft text in: http://www.scpwiki.com/forum/t-13965640/scp-idea-seeking-greenlight
• Posted a draft thread without greenlights: http://www.scpwiki.com/forum/t-13977836/scp-draft-the-impossible-hot-air-balloon
• Posted another thread for the same concept: http://www.scpwiki.com/forum/t-13978012/scp-greenlight-request
• Posted another thread for the same concept, with the full draft text: http://www.scpwiki.com/forum/t-13979032/scp-draft-the-impossible-hot-air-balloon

The comments they've posted in response to staff and reviewers don't indicate that they are listening to guidance or taking reviews into account:

http://www.scpwiki.com/forum/t-13965640/scp-idea-seeking-greenlight#post-4859960

Perhaps of what I said pf "filling" was a poor choice of words, but I figured that part out .
I can assure you that the draft I have is better as this is just the concept. the story (Which I have made ) will come in the drafting phase once this is greenlit. I have one question for you, wouldn't it be better to keep the origin a secret as for example as it adds to the mystery and lets people use their imagination?

http://www.scpwiki.com/forum/t-13965640/scp-idea-seeking-greenlight#post-4873761

I get it and I know what you're coming from. But wouldn't the mystery be more appealing?

http://www.scpwiki.com/forum/t-13965640/scp-idea-seeking-greenlight#post-4873765

Now that I fixed it can I get that greenlight?

http://www.scpwiki.com/forum/t-13978012/scp-greenlight-request#post-4873326

Could you by chance give me the 1/2 greenlights because nobody seems to greenlight it even the post I made a month ago?

I PMed them an official warning for spamming/ignoring staff direction. I believe we can move immediately to a ban on next infraction.

Re: Disciplinary - ShatteredAnvil

Zyn 18 Jan 2021 05:28

Noting that I received a reply to the warning:

with all do respect when I did the standard guidelines the "reviewers" said there wasn't enough information such as Marselles "So, there's not really a lot going on here." as an example. I was told in the lounge chat that you can post drafts without greenlights and more .If you could please restore it to it's previous idea? I apologize for messaging you directly but It seems what ever do people are telling to do the opposite.

I replied explaining their misunderstandings, and told them to slow down and read the guidelines more carefully.

Re: Disciplinary - ShatteredAnvil

MalyceGraves 18 Jan 2021 06:30

I am advocating for a revoke, at minimum. In the chat they have completely ignored critique, instead telling reviewers to read their draft. Furthermore,, they have utterly ignored repeated recommendations that they slow down and read more modern content before submitting.

User is rude, self absorbed, and is only interested in pushing their poorly conceived article without reading or listening to anyone else.

Last edited on 18 Jan 2021 06:31 by MalyceGraves Show more