GodlyUser has, in their very short time in chat, had multiple incidents of them providing less than desirable feedback and generally being immature. Today, the following incident occurred.
16:22:42 <GodlyUser> Here, have a look through again, and by the way cybersqyd, I think what you told be yesterday was that I must add in it a story of the SCP.
16:22:44 <GodlyUser> http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-13891302/seeking-greenlight-the-bartender#post-4833194
16:22:56 <AKaufer> DrSylvium I would love to
16:22:59 <DrSylvium> bet
16:23:08 <DrSylvium> I'll post the links here
16:23:10 <DrSylvium> http://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/drsylvium Sandbox
16:23:10 <DrSylvium> http://www.scpwiki.com/forum/t-13893788/scp-idea:pinular-gas Idea Crit Forum Post
16:23:47 <GodlyUser> I'll explain it directly now.
16:23:51 <GodlyUser> DrSylivium
16:24:00 <GodlyUser> The format needs improvements.
16:24:09 <DrSylvium> How so?
16:24:12 <GodlyUser> Currently there were users that were been downrated due to having bad formats.
16:24:36 <GodlyUser> Your formats needs to have improvments, by using one of the GoI formats that were been created by the wiki so far.
16:24:58 <DrSylvium> Please elaborate, I don't quite understand what you mean nor how I would get that format
16:25:12 <@cybersqyd> GodlyUser, this advice is at best confusing and at worst actively misleading
16:25:29 <GodlyUser> Your SCP contains too much description, shorten it down by using footnotes!
16:25:38 <@cybersqyd> GoI Formats are a completely different thing to SCP articles
16:25:55 <DrSylvium> Why would I need footnotes
16:25:59 <@cybersqyd> And they are also a completely different thing to e.g. adding interview logs or style elements such as ACS
16:26:05 <DrSylvium> and isn't more description better?
16:26:18 <@cybersqyd> ehh more description isn't necessarily better but giving people more information is yes
16:26:24 <GodlyUser> No, there are SCPs that got rated high of having less description.
16:26:35 <DrSylvium> That makes little to no sense
16:26:39 <DrSylvium> but ok
16:27:46 <GodlyUser> Dude, giving your SCPs footnotes makes it become more informative, here have a look at mines.
16:27:51 <DrSylvium> I mean like, what description should I footnote, and how would I footnote?
16:28:03 <DrSylvium> do you mean the little number thing?
16:28:12 <DrSylvium> that brings you to the bottom?
16:28:21 <DrSylvium> or where you click it and it swaps page
16:28:24 <GodlyUser> Like, if there is another effect that your SCP could do, use footnotes of course.
16:28:26 <@cybersqyd> GodlyUser, this is a formal warning: your critique here is misleading. I highly recommend you spend some time reading modern SCPs and getting a feel for current standards before continuing.
16:28:36 <GodlyUser> Oh, okay.
16:28:53 <@cybersqyd> GodlyUser, I am saying this because we will move towards further disciplinary action if you continue insisting on this footnote thing for an ideas critique.
16:29:23 <GodlyUser> Okay, I get it cyber, but wait, when does Christmas starts in your places by the way?
16:29:35 <DrSylvium> It isn't just an ideas critique, I sent both the sandbox and ideas critique
16:29:44 <DrSylvium> he may mean the sandbox
16:29:52 <DrSylvium> but idk
16:30:05 <@cybersqyd> They may but they do not become more right if they do.
16:30:17 <GodlyUser> What do you mean, cyber?
16:30:29 <DrSylvium> By the way I sent you the wikidot message cyber
16:30:44 <@cybersqyd> GodlyUser, I mean, insisting someone use footnotes in their SCP when you don't really have a good example of why is not a good idea.
16:30:48 <@cybersqyd> DrSylvium, yes I saw.
16:30:53 <DrSylvium> Alright
16:31:18 <@cybersqyd> it's a way of having helen send a message to someone
16:31:21 <GodlyUser> Wait, hang on, <@cybersqyd last time you told me that my SCP needs to have a story, so I did write out its story.
16:31:53 <@cybersqyd> GodlyUser, what does this have to do with anything?
16:32:11 <GodlyUser> You told me that yesterday, so I did what you told me too.
16:32:28 <@MalyceGraves> 👁️
16:32:33 <GodlyUser> Because you said that you've forget, so I've reminded you.
16:32:43 <@cybersqyd> Congrats? If you're wanting me to provide critique on your idea, you should send me a wikidot PM
16:33:18 <GodlyUser> Yeah, if you want to say something else, let it be tomorrow, I'm going to bed now. See yah
16:33:21 ⇐ GodlyUser quit (PI.72.3.lsb.rbg-PCS|egnuoleht#PI.72.3.lsb.rbg-PCS|egnuoleht) The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat
16:33:32 <DrSylvium> .-.
16:33:46 <DrSylvium> that was… something?
16:34:29 <@Naveil> let's get back on topic, folks
16:42:54 @MalyceGraves banned *!*SCP-gbr.bsl.3.27.IP!*@* (+b)
16:42:54 %Half ops Timed ban *!*SCP-gbr.bsl.3.27.IP!*@* added by MalyceGraves on #thecritters lasting for 1d.
16:44:12 <@MalyceGraves> .tell godlyuser You have been given a 24h ban from #thecritters. You may not utilize any of the other public SCP channels for giving or receiving critique. You may appeal this decision in #site17
16:44:13 <%Secretary_Helen> MalyceGraves: *Jots that down on her clipboard* Got it, I'll let them know…
Given this was a fragment of their history, and with the assent of several crit staff, a 24 hour ban for #thecritters was implemented.
Edit: Trimmed irrelevant sections for clarity.