New site member GodlyUser does not match any existing user name (account age 68 days, site membership 15 days) recently posted the following to someone's concept thread:
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-13893289/the-mirror-greenlight#post-4834974
Dude, you're not supposed to post a thread that is over 400 words. Your thread is only allowed to have 400 words limited.
The thread in question was compliant with the required reading, as the wordcount applies to part of the template, not the entirety of the text in the first post.
This is not the first time they have presented misinformation/accusations excessively authoritatively: http://www.scpwiki.com/scp-5924/comments/show#post-4826723
I don't hold any urge against this SCP at all, but how calm it gets so many ratings?! I mean the formats are not even comparable to the ones that're currently in the low-rated sections, yet the information is lesser than the ones in the low formatted pages unless the author is using some kind of sub-accounts that he/she has and started to-rated their own pages…just guessing.
Yes, I understand, but I wasn't talking about the votings, I was talking about the formatting.
Where they seem to assume that the ACS formatting is a requirement.
I've dropped an official warning. Of note, they've sent me numerous PMs in the past two days, including because they thought they were banned from the IRC chatrooms (turns out, they just didn't identify themselves/their nick upon entry).
Given their typing style and the timestamp of the PMs, I'm guessing they're ESL rather than underage.