Disciplinary - Matt Stormcrow

Summary:

Vehemence, violation of Rule 0

Disciplinary - Matt Stormcrow

MalyceGraves 07 Oct 2020 18:13

Matt Stormcrow's (W:39d | S: 28d) earlier history can be seen here: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-13794459/non-disc-record-matt-stormcrow

I am escalating to Disciplinary because their vehemence has been taken up a notch. They recently added to their diatribe on 5416 with the following:

+ Details

Yes, I did. I was ignored, several times on IRC, until I literally pointed out people were not responding to me at all while they were responding to other people who posted right after me. Then I got one response.

I'm not waiting a month for one reviewer to give me bad advice. I don't think that's reasonable to expect from someone who is doing volunteer writing for fun.

If I'm being downvoted as punishment for not getting it reviewed, so be it? I don't get it. I am ridiculously disappointed at this point, and am just ignoring the advice about using critters.

Edit: I know your green light process is to weed out the 14 year olds with the grammar skills of a troglodyte, so I apologize if "This is good but I'm downvoting, why didn't you workshop it?" set me off on this tangent because I'm over here thinking, "Sure, I'll spend WAY too much time begging for that to get crap advice and it'll still probably fail, and I'd get more useful feedback way quicker just by posting directly to the wiki."

Helen has the following record:

13:17 <•Secretary_Helen> I last saw mattstormcrow 7 days ago in #thecritters saying: Fair enough. It's just when I read an SCP, little details like those which imply some sort of connection but never really tell you anything, I like those.
13:17 <•Secretary_Helen> I first met mattstormcrow 8 days ago in #thecritters saying: Looking for feedback on my first attempt: http://www.scpwiki.com/forum/t-13767762/riptide

According to my logs, they came in several times over the course of 24 hours and were fairly salty pretty much from the go.

[2020-09-28 14:54:01] <MattStormcrow> I posted this when apparently all the 'real critters' were asleep or busy, so I'd still appreciate feedback on this - http://REMOVED

[2020-09-29 15:37:29] <MattStormcrow> So, I've asked several times for feedback here over the last couple days, and I haven't gotten any. So, am I doing something wrong or am I just being impatient?
[2020-09-29 15:38:26] <Francis> More likely just unlucky. There are usually a few of us on at one time, but I have students I work with and am only sporadically available, and am walking out the door in a few minutes. What do you need looked at?

They eventually switched from trying to get greenlights to trying to get draft crit on an ungreenlit draft, which most staff reviewers clearly stated they would not do.

I think a revocation is in order here for both continuously misrepresenting themselves, excessive vehemence, and for just not being willing or patient to work within the system.

EDIT: Put stuff under a fold.

EDITx2: After some discussion, I'm all for a weeklong ban on this one.

Last edited on 07 Oct 2020 19:27 by MalyceGraves Show more

Re: Disciplinary - Matt Stormcrow

DrMagnus 07 Oct 2020 19:29

Seconding

Re: Disciplinary - Matt Stormcrow

Tuomey Tombstone 07 Oct 2020 21:08

3rd

Re: Disciplinary - Matt Stormcrow

N_Aepic_Fael 08 Oct 2020 02:05

PM has been sent

+ show block

This is a notification from the SCP Foundation wiki. Due to your recent behavior on the mainsite, namely exhibiting excessive vehemence, you have received a weeklong site ban. The details of your ban have been listed here: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-13796005/disciplinary-matt-stormcrow. Further infractions will result in escalation of the disciplinary action.

The ban elapses on October 14, 2020. If you would like to speak with a staff member regarding this ban, please seek out a member of the Disciplinary Team in #site17.