Noting that TSAT, RTME, and myself went through the various revisions of these and have determined the series of edits between them to be insignificant. There are minor dialogue and phrasing changes between them, sentences added here and there, etc., but generally the fundamental issues of the article and the main text remain relatively unchanged. The three of us have access to the various iterations upon request.
This article was essentially reposted four times in half as many days with minimal edits. Additionally, each version of the article received a litany of downvotes before their various deletions and repostings, meaning that these reposts are essentially gaming site voting procedure. I'm recommending that the Disc team take a look, because it's probably revoke time at least. I haven't sent the user any kind of PM yet, but I can if requested.
