Disciplinary - DrACSM

Summary:

Posted a concept critique thread about a joke SCP involving the kidnapping of underage children

Disciplinary - DrACSM

Zyn 02 Mar 2020 16:27

New site member DrACSM (account age 2 days, site membership 1 day) posted the following concept thread: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13097462/scp-5044-j

It included the following text (in the thread summary, not the actual main post, without the correct template):

SCP 5044-j is a school bus with standard yellow stripes.Scp 5044-1 is a thick bald man who has a white beard.Every day at 7:45 He goes to a random street and kidnaps kids.We assumed he a SCP with his thick [REDACTED].[Note]The children he picks up is around the age range of 8-12 years of age.

I dropped an official warning and locked the thread. I stated that there would be a ban on next infraction, but given that this is the only post from the user, do we want to just remove them from the site now?

Re: Disciplinary - DrACSM

pxdnbluesoul 02 Mar 2020 16:46

No, only because the statement was already made to essentially let this be their warning. I suspect they'll make the decision easy for us as early as their next post.

Re: Disciplinary - DrACSM

pxdnbluesoul 02 Mar 2020 20:49

I suspect they'll make the decision easy for us as early as their next post.

Man, when you're right, you're right.

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-13098252/scp-5023 features the same subpar behavior.

Summary: SCP 5023 Class-Euclid Containment Procedures-A average Pokémon theme bedroom with a variation of Pokémon toys and the newest Pokémon media broadcast on the TV every 24 hours. SCP 5023 is a stuffed doll of the famous Pokémon pikachu and is possessed by a Ghost.It was found at a auction in downtown Chicago and was said to say different phrases every time you shook it.The reason It got the foundation attention is that it said weird phrases in a grown mans voice.The foundation bought the toy and noticed it had full sentience.

Let's go ahead and look at a revoke.

Re: Disciplinary - DrACSM

Zyn 02 Mar 2020 21:39

Membership revoked. Do we want to discuss a ban, seeing as they were directly warned about this behavior?

Re: Disciplinary - DrACSM

Jacob Conwell 02 Mar 2020 23:40

I'd support a weeklong to give them some time to cool out. I am amenable to a longer ban though, should we deem it necessary.

Re: Disciplinary - DrACSM

pxdnbluesoul 03 Mar 2020 03:24

In agreement with a short ban. I think they probably need more than that just to thoroughly read the guides and change their behavior, but it's a start.