Disciplinary - Doctor Connors

Summary:

Immaturity, doesn't understand site, spamming, backseat modding

Disciplinary - Doctor Connors

Zyn 21 Feb 2020 08:31

New site member Doctor Connors (account age and site membership 20 days) has been repeatedly indicating that they don't understand how the site works, and spamming low-quality concepts for review:

• Their first post, one day ago. Full draft into draft forum, no greenlight: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13059115/potential-scp-5058-the-knowledge-eater
• Triple-post: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13059115/potential-scp-5058-the-knowledge-eater
• Repeat draft thread, full draft to forum, no greenlights: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13059480/the-potential-scp-5058
• Repeat idea thread: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13059549/a-revised-potential-scp-5058
• Repeat idea thread, in draft forum: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13061343/the-info-eraser
• Repeat idea thread: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13061446/the-info-eraser-potential-new-scp
• Another low quality idea thread: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13061653/potential-scp-in-need-of-greenlight "Ok so my idea is basically a pill that can cure any disease but if someone with no disease takes a pill they will get the last disease that was cured and here’s a rough simplified draft for the containment procedures"
• http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13062009/the-sanity-stone-needs-two-green-lights#post-4509259 "Description: SCP-XXXX is a black stone with crimson paint made of blood it’s primary anomalous property is that it emits a constant high pitched noise measured as (I’ll add this once it’s green lit) which gradually drives the listener to madness."
• Another repeat idea thread: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13062238/the-sanity-stone-needs-two-greenlights#post-4509340

Problematic feedback:

+ show block

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13061714/paper-wizard#post-4509147

I’m not an experienced writer but I like this idea! Good job.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13058733/life-support#post-4509199

I think SCP-500 could help. But other than that I don’t know.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13061869/scp-needs-greenlighted#post-4509207

It’s a good idea but I’d fix some grammar and refer to SCP-XXXX as “the item,”, “the object”, or just “SCP-XXXX”. Other than that probs to you it’s a good concept.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13062028/scp-idea-need-greenlight#post-4509271

That’s a cool idea I hope it gets green lighted.

Backseat modding:

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13055724/scp-idea:warrior-mantises#post-4509222

Don’t ever post your full document here people get really mad. I’d edit that down a bit really fast. But other than that it’s a cool concept, good job.

Given that literally every post from them has been problematic in some way, I've revoked their membership. PM sent.

Re: Disciplinary - Doctor Connors

Zyn 27 Feb 2020 04:50

So they returned to the site today, and immediately continued posting more problematic reviews/forum comments.

• New low-quality idea thread: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13083063/potential-joke-scp-the-uncultured-swine "This SCP is a guy but when exposed to any media on any country or culture they will try to replicate it and fail miserably like if he was shown a documentary in soviet Russia said entity would go full communist"
• Vague feedback on a draft with no greenlights: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13083083/faulty-mnestic#post-4519353 "the grammars a bit whacky, it’s not a huge problem but I’d get cracking on that"
• More vague feedback on a draft with no greenlights: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13083181/my-scp-draft "First up you are kind of prone to spelling errors, I would get working on those first. Another error that really needs fixing is how un clinical the document sounds."
• Vehemence and dogpiling: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13083162/this-site-seems-very-unwelcoming "We have high standards we NEED TO otherwise we would be flooded by edgy anime boys, and other self inserts. The quality control is essential now go back to deviantart or something."
• Vague feedback on another draft: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13083326/the-most-awesome-chair-ever#post-4519506 "I really like this concept, it’s unique, and interesting. But there are a few flaws, first up you do have a few grammatical errors, these aren’t a huge deal but make the article less clinical."
• Backseat modding: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13083352/scp-xxxx-the-demon-of-the-astral-plane#post-4519522 "Unless you can do something really original like SCP-2662 I don’t think this article would do to well. So try to think of something unique about your SCP and post it again here."
• Repeat of new idea thread: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13083646/the-uncultured-swine-potential-joke-scp
• Yet another idea thread: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13083768/the-mind-stealing-virus

I've issued a C&D order. PM sent.

I believe we can move to a long ban on the next infraction, due to the sheer amount of cleanup this user has needed. Monthlong on next infraction?

Re: Disciplinary - Doctor Connors

Jacob Conwell 27 Feb 2020 21:10

Agreeing with month-long on the next infraction.

Re: Disciplinary - Doctor Connors

A Random Day 27 Feb 2020 17:31

I’d support giving them a monthlong ban right now, but on next infraction is also fine.