Noting that they made a new thread after prompting… in the per page discussions category. http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12200924/experiment-log-914-hub#post-4301774
I moved it to the correct forum. Not sure how they keep messing up new thread posting, but there you have it.
ETA: also, ported in material from repeat thread: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-12261531/non-disc-record-kai-wines
New site member Kai Wines does not match any existing user name (account age 26 days, site membership 20 days) has been demonstrating a lack of understanding as to how the site works, particularly with regards to interacting with staff.
The first instance was when they noted:
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12254531/scp-have-you-seen-this-dog#post-4314892
Yep - I've asked Zyn to update the description in the original post already. Thanks for pointing it out!
They didn't send any form of contact to me at all; they just edited the first post of their thread with the request as if expecting me to follow said thread and find it. It was also kind of creepy that one of the original notes in the post (which has over 25 revisions) noted:
I've tried to keep everything (title, description, and contents) short. Love you, Zyn!
They also pulled the "ask a question, when staff show up, ask them for critique "since they're here already" attention-grabbing stunt.
In the same thread, they also replied to feedback that told them "Honestly, I don't think this is a worthy pursuit. I'd personally recommend putting this idea aside to work on something else." with:
I know I'm not supposed to dump a fully formed SCP here, but it all sprang out pretty quickly.
Which was a collapsible leading to a full draft. And then they sent me the following PM:
Hi there Zyn, sorry for being such a handful. Could you please review my SCP idea? I've renamed it (again), so thanks a lot!
with no link to the thread, again seemingly assuming that I followed their forum thread super closely or something.
They also have some past behavior of spamming/bumping a draft thread made without greenlights.
Keep an eye on, I guess. Personally this behavior comes off as more immature than outright malicious, but I have declined to review any further content for them given how they don't listen to direction and so far most of the feedback given to them seems to have not been well-used.
I believe a revoke is in order if this behavior continues.