Noting that approximately 3 hours after their site membership was re-instated, they proceeded to coldpost the wolf article again: http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-4062
Scp-4062 was discovered by Dr.████████ in ███████, Canada when local wolf attack reports skyrocketed. MTF team █████ were sent in to contain it. It is now stored at Site-94. A custom holding cell was added upon it's containment.
Scp-4062 resembles a grey wolf. It has the ability to change the color of it's pelt to blend in with its environment. The reason it does this is unknown. It often fails to do this causing damage to Scp-4062’s body. This is believed to be because of an overdose of melatonin trying to spread throughout it's entire body. When injured, It is to be sedated and then have bandages applied when knocked out. It is also known to cause others near it to see strange things and utter things like "Everything is clear now." Victims later report seeing and hearing made up words such as "I saw the snarfle." After around two or three weeks victims report a fear of Scp-4062 as well as wolfs in general. This usually lasts around 1-2 weeks. The radius of it's ability to make subjects hear and see these words is estimated at 2 meters.
When called out on the repost and given critique, they responded:
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-10430999/scp-4062#post-4166729
See, this is what I've been getting and I feel like most new posters get. I put something on the drafts and critiques forum and send it to other members of the foundation and they tell me how to change it so I do. Then I come here and get feedback telling me to do the opposite (ex. With the whole putting Scp-4062 in bold) I feel like reposting it here but changing to what you critiques me on last time is better than drafts and critiques because it's what the community wants me to post. I'm pretty much done with drafts and critiques because every bit of feedback I get there is the opposite of what you guys want. And it's YOUR vote that matters. I get such opposing opinions I don't even know what to change. " How to write an SCP" helps, but you can't really use it as a step-by-step guide. It doesn't directly tell you what to write. I wish I could just combine everyone into one person, then ask them as a whole what they want.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-10430999/scp-4062#post-4166749
I have plenty of friends within the foundation, some long time pros, some new. And I ask them for criticism. Only a couple know of my first draft. It was like a paragraph long. And there were more errors than stars. But I look back and I see my draft coming this far. But I couldn't do it without the community. I'm proud that I can promise you I MADE SURE that I changed my article with every piece of criticism I got. 90% of this is just what comments, ideas and brainstorming, drafts and critiques, others members, and friends in the foundation told me to write. Granted, I have added some things myself, but I asked MANY people what they thought before posting. I may have only done 2(I had an earlier account with the same name that I deleted and then made this one) rounds of ideas and brainstorming and a few drafts and critiques forum, but everything I have gotten has went into the article.
When people asked whom gave them the feedback they apparently followed: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-10430999/scp-4062#post-4166767
Yeah. Different guy than the one that told me the bold thing. I won't give names so ppl don't go harassing them
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-10430999/scp-4062#post-4166786
Idk just thinking some ppl might go tell them they r idiots or something just making sure
At any rate, I've revoked their membership due to the sheer amount of time people keep needing to devote to this person. They've already gotten a revoke and a weeklong ban for this exact behavior. Do we move to monthlong or yearlong ban?
