- Talk to the Disciplinary Team
- Disciplinary Committee Reports
- Disciplinary Committee
- Disciplinary Committee Structure
For general chat, please go to #site19, the official SCP Foundation chat room.
Click Below To Enter a New Report
Another Disciplinary Addition posted on 11 Dec 2015 21:54 by djkaktus
Noting here that Bouncl has been added to the Disciplinary Committee.
Click to edit: Another Disciplinary Addition (Updated on 11 Dec 2015 21:54 by djkaktus)
Disciplinary Addition posted on 23 Nov 2015 23:40 by djkaktus
Posting this to verify that I've added Crayne to the Disciplinary Committee. Honestly, I thought he was already a member, but I was mistaken. Making it official here.
Click to edit: Disciplinary Addition (Updated on 23 Nov 2015 23:40 by djkaktus)
Sinclair? posted on 12 May 2015 08:03 by DrClef
Saw this on Tumblr:
No idea who this is, but maybe someone else can give some insight?
Click to edit: Sinclair? (Updated on 12 May 2015 08:03 by DrClef)
The #MENINIST shitbag posted on 16 Feb 2015 20:58 by Eskobar
Multiple offenses under multiple different identities on both chat and wiki. Consolidated thread of offenses can be found here.
Click to edit: The #MENINIST shitbag (Updated on 16 Feb 2015 20:58 by Eskobar)
DrGatsby/James Vale/Torin Blackguard posted on 30 Jun 2014 11:33 by Eskobar
I'M BRINGING THESE BACK NOW, PROBABLY A GOOD IDEA
Link to disciplinary thread here and here and chatban thread here. User arrived months ago as DrGatsby and was warned quickly after joining, then dropped off the face of the earth. Earlier in the month, he reapplied as James Vale, admitted he used to be DrGatsby, and was readmitted. No incident until this past weekend, when he changed his Wikidot name to Torin Blackguard, made a series of low-content, almost spammy posts and received a warning from staff. After some more low-content posts, he made a "leaving" thread in which he loudly proclaimed that he was leaving the wiki. Shortly after that, he posted again in that thread to add an ASCII middle finger (that apparently included a dick?), then jumped into #site19 and did the same thing, then sent a PM to Zyn and did the same thing. Permabanned, with the possibility of review in six months.
you ban me? do you think i give a shit? i do not want to be a part of that site and i hope the scp-wiki burns in hell. fuck you scp-wiki.
I can't discuss an ASCII dick and middle finger and not include at least one.
Click to edit: DrGatsby/James Vale/Torin Blackguard (Updated on 30 Jun 2014 11:33 by Eskobar)
Three Whole Admins? posted on 27 Mar 2014 06:15 by Communism will win
Thinking it over, I'm not sure that requiring three admins to enact a ban is necessary. Our moderators are wise and trustworthy enough, I think, to have the assent of three of them be enough to make a ban happen, with an admin executing it. I think wanting the whole three admins to make a ban permanent, though, would be fine.
There could also be a provision for controversial situations, but that's more or less a given.
In the past, I've used members of the disciplinary team as stand ins for admins when determining initial bans. I think this is an excellent policy we should make official. Thoughts?
Twenty-three days without comment? I'm going to assume everyone likes my idea and enact it into law.
3 for perma and a minimum of 1 for tempban works for me.
Click to edit: Three Whole Admins? (Updated on 24 Apr 2014 18:37 by Drewbear)
DrSkyer/Terarex posted on 14 Mar 2014 14:33 by Eskobar
User Terarex created a sockpuppet account for himself under the name DrSkyer. Under sockpuppeting guidelines (and accompanied by negative, although not necessarily actionable, behavior in chat) both accounts were permabanned.
Click to edit: DrSkyer/Terarex (Updated on 14 Mar 2014 14:33 by Eskobar)
Vezaz posted on 08 Mar 2014 00:38 by Eskobar
After flagrant rudeness towards two separate users, deliberate disregard of valid critique by Site Critique members, violation of a stop order, disregard for Staff authority, and a request for a permaban, user was banned with no definite date for unbanning. Discussion thread can be found here.
[edit:] Ban was rescinded 12 December 2015.
Click to edit: Vezaz (Updated on 19 Jan 2017 16:05 by Quikngruvn)
Dave Mike posted on 02 Mar 2014 18:18 by Eskobar
Repeated, repeated poor critique after both in-thread and PM warnings from staff. Given a 24-hour ban. After the ban expired and was lifted, improved temporarily and then declined into poor critique again. Given a week-long ban, evaded ban using sockpuppet Jack Nickle. Permabanned.
Click to edit: Dave Mike (Updated on 11 Mar 2014 07:42 by Zyn)
DrBlack posted on 01 Feb 2014 14:46 by Eskobar
Profound, supreme creepiness on the forums and sandbox from a user with no positive contributions to the wiki in any way. Warned, then continued. As per harsh penalties for creepitude, banned for one week.
Timer removed. — Eskobar
Click to edit: DrBlack (Updated on 16 Aug 2014 02:38 by Eskobar)
TheMinecraftian posted on 29 Jan 2014 23:45 by Eskobar
Repeated, repeated shitposting with little to no actual, useful content. Warned via PM. Repeated shitposting after warning. Thread can be found here. Presently banned for 24 hours.
Timer removed. — Eskobar
Reapplied and accepted…. apparently he's 42?
Click to edit: TheMinecraftian (Updated on 16 Aug 2014 02:38 by Eskobar)
BigBadGreen666 posted on 29 Jan 2014 19:47 by Eskobar
Posted and then reposted what was deemed to be a troll article. Membership revoked. Reapplied and was readmitted, immediately posted a different troll article. Banned for one week.
Timer removed. —Eskobar
Click to edit: BigBadGreen666 (Updated on 16 Aug 2014 02:38 by Eskobar)
evanocho posted on 24 Jan 2014 12:21 by Eskobar
User evanocho made a series of ridiculous edits immediately after being accepted to the wiki, including trying to make himself a personnel file. User also was a member of the SCP Archive page and had made unnecessary edits over there. Membership revoked.
Click to edit: evanocho (Updated on 24 Jan 2014 12:21 by Eskobar)
Zenoseiya posted on 23 Jan 2014 00:53 by Pig_catapult
Click to edit: Zenoseiya (Updated on 23 Jan 2014 06:11 by Pig_catapult)
Schifter posted on 19 Jan 2014 21:46 by Eskobar
Banned for repeated harshness and snark in critique as documented in this thread.
Timer removed. — Eskobar
Click to edit: Schifter (Updated on 16 Aug 2014 02:37 by Eskobar)
bravo104 posted on 18 Jan 2014 16:47 by SoullessSingularity
As seen in this thread he's been given a warning for repeated nonconstructive, snarky posts.
Click to edit: bravo104 (Updated on 18 Jan 2014 16:47 by SoullessSingularity)
Psychopathic Madman - Resolved posted on 14 Jan 2014 18:24 by SoullessSingularity
As can be viewed in this thread he is repeatedly breaking criticism policy and despite multiple warnings has not improved in his flagrant, snarky attitude. One-week ban by staff consensus.
Timer removed. — Eskobar
His account was deleted. Huzzah.
Click to edit: Psychopathic Madman - Resolved (Updated on 16 Aug 2014 02:37 by Eskobar)
Mission Statement posted on 09 Jan 2014 04:02 by Eskobar
FOR ALL MEMBERS OF DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE:
The purpose and mission of the Disciplinary Committee is, first and foremost, to prevent the breaking of rules. This is not to be confused with punishing people for breaking rules; while this is a part of our job, it is a means to a larger end.
Our job is to protect the creative environment of the SCP Foundation Wiki by policing behaviors that we have found to be non-conducive to that environment. We are expected to use our best judgment in deciding what actions, behavior, and phrasing on our part best resolve disciplinary infractions with the least amount of disruption to the community. Our actions should seek to support the best possible outcome even for those committing the infraction; if they can be made into productive members of the site, we should help them do so.
Our job is to make judgment calls in those instances where the rules are more subjective, such as applications of Wheaton's Law. We who are members of this committee are currently believed to have sufficient maturity and intelligence to use subjective rules to the common good of the site.
Our job is to enforce the rules of the wiki. When someone breaks our rules, we will issue warnings. If it needs to go farther, we will push it up to administration to determine if a ban is warranted.
Our job is to help users obey the rules in those instances where they have difficulties doing so. If the best way to do that is sitting down and talking with a problem user, we will do so. If the best way to do that is removing them from the site, we will do so.
Welcome to the Disciplinary Committee.
Click to edit: Mission Statement (Updated on 09 Jan 2014 04:02 by Eskobar)
Disciplinary Committee posted on 08 Jan 2014 05:53 by TroyL
This is the first written report for the Disciplinary Committee. To write a report, simply create a new page using the new page template at the top of this tabbed document. All pages created using that tool will be logged here and kept.
Click to edit: Disciplinary Committee (Updated on 08 Jan 2014 05:53 by TroyL)
Administrative Contacts: (All of them)
Responsibilities: This team, composed entirely of moderators, will handle all moderator-level disciplinary action, such as:
- Call stops to disruptive conversations.
- Edit offensive posts.
- Deliver warnings to members who break rules.
- Report bannable offenses to administration.
- Vote on and contribute to ban deliberations.
- Maintain Site Rules with assistance of administration.
All members of Disciplinary Committee are expected to monitor Recent Forum Posts, the forums in general, and any other section of the site for disciplinary infractions of Site Rules. Members of Disciplinary Committee are to follow stated procedures for determining whether an infraction has taken place, responding appropriately to the infraction, and reporting the details of the user, infraction, and response on 05. Aside from the team leader, there is no hierarchical structure to the committee; all members are equally trusted to use their discretion and judgment to carry out their duties in a fair and impartial manner.
The team leader is DrEverettMann. Committee members may consult with one another or any of the administrative contacts (namely DrEverettMann DrClef, DrBright, Waxx, and TroyL) if they have questions regarding specific or general aspects of committee responsibilities.
This page was created and is maintained by TroyL. If there are issues with this page, please contact him.